Stealth compensation: Do CEOs increase their pay by influencing dividend policy? ¬リニ
نویسندگان
چکیده
Article history: Received 13 August 2012 Received in revised form 31 December 2013 Accepted 16 January 2014 Available online 23 January 2014 Companies can increase executive compensation by allowing dividends to be paid on unvested restricted stocks grants, also known as stealth compensation. Examining all S&P 500 firms over the period 2003–2007, we find that more than half of the dividend paying firms allow this practice. We look atwhether this form of compensation reduces agency costs or decreases value for shareholders. We find that CEOs' stealth compensation amounts to an average of $180,000 in additional income, which increases the CEOs' cash compensation and total compensation by 9% and 2% respectively. Firms engaging in stealth compensation have higher dividend payout ratios than those not allowing stealth compensation. For all firms using stealth compensation, there is a reduction in average ROA and Tobin's Q over the long run. However, stealth compensation companies with potential agency issues see a meaningful improvement in their long run performance. For weakly governed companies, stealth compensation may act as a bonding mechanism which may serve to reduce agency costs and therefore increase shareholder value. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: M41 M52 J33
منابع مشابه
What do CEOs Realize from Option Pay
We compare the proceeds that CEOs realize from exercising stock options with the total nominal value (estimated fair value) of option pay that they receive during their tenures. For a sample of CEOs who completed their tenures during the period from 1992 to 2007, we find that the amount realized from exercising options is about 68% of the nominal value of options received and that realized tota...
متن کاملCEO incentives-its not how much you pay, but how.
The arrival of spring means yet another round in the national debate over executive compensation. But the critics have it wrong. The relentless attention on how much CEOs are paid diverts public attention from the real problem-how CEOs are paid. The authors present an in-depth statistical analysis of executive compensation. The study incorporates data on thousands of CEOs spanning five decades....
متن کامل%hfdxvhh, ¶pp:ruwkk,w" Ceo Pay and Corporate Governance*
*The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia or the Federal Reserve System. Recently, there has been strong public outrage against current pay practices for corporate CEOs, regardver the past few years, there has been strong public outrage against current pay practices for corporate CEOs. To deal with th...
متن کاملDo CEOs Set Their Own Pay? The Ones Without Principals Do
We empirically examine two competing views of CEO pay. In the contracting view, pay is used to solve an agency problem: the compensation committee optimally chooses pay contracts which give the CEO incentives to maximize shareholder wealth. In the skimming view, pay is the result of an agency problem: CEOs have managed to capture the pay process so that they set their own pay, constrained somew...
متن کاملHedging Executive Compensation Risk Through Investment Banks
Allowing CEOs to hedge the risk in the compensation contracts their rms give them has been controversial because such hedging permits the executives to undo some of the incentive e¤ects of those contracts; it also results in a divergence between the compensation rms pay their senior executives and the compensation those executives e¤ectively receive. We analyze the personal hedging activities...
متن کامل